SHYAM LAL Vs. BALBIR SINGH DHILLON AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) C.M. No. 17165 -CII -2013 in C.R. No. 2163 of 2009

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the non -applicant states that he has no objection to the applications being allowed but this would be without prejudice to the rights of the parties in any other proceeding, if pending.

(3.) THE findings of the Appellate Authority were not tested further. The present revision petitions had arisen from rent petitions filed by the respondent -landlord in the year 2004 claiming eviction of the petitioners again on the ground of non -payment of rent w.e.f. July 1997 onwards. In these proceedings also, the petitioners took up similar pleas disputing the relationship of landlord and tenant and offering it as an excuse for nonpayment of rent.