TEKA RAM Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petition has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant pension as well as other retiral benefits to the petitioner.

(2.) BRIEFLY , the facts of the case are that the petitioner was initially appointed as Peon in Municipal Committee, Julana on 5.2.1970 and ultimately retired on 30.6.1998 but inspite of making representations, the retiral benefits have not been released to him. The reason for not releasing the retiral benefits to the petitioner is that he produced a false affidavit showing his wrong date of birth and accordingly on the basis of complaint made against him, an FIR No. 130 dated 30.7.1999 under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC was registered against him, in which, ultimately he was acquitted of the charges by the trial Court vide its judgment dated 2.5.2008.

(3.) WRITTEN statement on behalf of respondent No. 2 has been filed and the same is on record.