JUGRAJ SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking the quashing of order dated 5.4.2012 at Annexure P1 passed by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur to the extent that directions have been issued for notice to be issued to the petitioner as also another under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to show cause as to why they be not punished for giving false evidence in the Court. Further challenge is to the notice under Section 344 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dated 1.10.2013 at Annexure P4 that has been issued in pursuance to the impugned order dated 5.4.2012, Annexure P1.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has been heard at length and the case paper book has been  perused.

(3.) LEARNED counsel has not been able to rebut the aforenoticed factual position as has been noticed by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur in the impugned order dated 5.4.2012. The impugned order, as such, does not suffer from any perversity.