CONSTABLE RAJINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER impugns the order dated 19.6.2014 (Annexure P -3), whereby the petitioner was not deputed for undergoing the Lower School Course on the ground that he was awarded major punishment, vide order dated 16.3.2012 (Annexure P -4).

(2.) NOTICE of motion was issued and pursuant thereto, written statement on behalf of the respondents has been filed. Petitioner has filed his replication.

(3.) PER contra, learned counsel for the State, while relying on the averments taken in para 3 of the preliminary submissions of the written statement, submits that since Rule 16.1. (3) of the Punjab Police Rules ('PPR' for short) includes withholding of increments in the major punishments, claim of the petitioner was considered, but was not found acceptable. He prays for dismissal of the writ petition.