NIRMLA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioners who are the parents -in -laws of deceased Savita seek regular bail in a case registered against them for the offence under Section 304 -B read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has contended that in fact the daughter of the complainant had an affair with one Anil son of Ved, Lambardar. He has referred to the call details (Annexure P1) on the mobile telephones of Savita and Anil showing the various conversations between the two. Besides, a reference has been made to the hand -written note (Annexure P2) of Savita in which she is purported to have recorded that she had committed a misdeed in her lifetime and had cheated Vinod -husband of Savita (deceased) by establishing undesirable relation with someone else who was Anil son of Ved, Lambardar. Now, she (deceased) was fed up with her life and, therefore, she wished to end her life. No harm shall be done to Vinod and his family members and for this, no legal action may be taken against them. On the strength of the same, it is submitted that the petitioners are liable to be granted the concession of bail.