YOGESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari directing the respondents to consider the petitioner at the time of interview to the post of Sanitary Inspectors. The main argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was having 69% marks in Sanitary Diploma but while shortlisting, the requirement was of 70% and hence, the petitioner was not called for interview.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is of shortlisting the criteria. The selection on the post of Sanitary Inspector was subject matter of dispute in CWP No. 16724 of 2011 titled as Sunita Devi and others v. Haryana Staff Selection Commission and another, decided on 11.03.2014 which was allowed with the following directions: - -

(3.) KEEPING in view the decision in CWP No. 16724 of 2011 decided on 11.03.2014, no ground is made out to interfere in the shortlisting process. The petition is accordingly dismissed.