RESHAM Vs. ANAND UDYOG

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS order disposes of CR No.1776 of 2014 titled Resham vs. M/S Anand Udyog, Plot No.36 -A, Dabua -Pali Road, Near Octroi No.17, N.I.T, Faridabad, CR No.1779 of 2014 titled Sundri Devi vs. M/S Anand Udyog, Plot No.36 -A, Dabua -Pali Road, Near Octroi No.17, N.I.T, Faridabad and CR No.1780 of 2014 titled Sumantra vs. M/S Anand Udyog, Plot No.36 -A, Dabua -Pali Road, Near Octroi No.17, N.I.T, Faridabad. The facts are taken from CR No.1776 of 2014.

(2.) THIS is a revision petition against an interlocutory order passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court -III, Faridabad. The workman's request was for permission to lead additional/further evidence examined through departmental witnesses to speak from the record available with the Registrar of Companies, Delhi and the District Industries Centre, Faridabad to prove his case has been turned down and the Presiding Officer who has clearly misdirected himself, according to the learned counsel, by assuming without any basis and reasoning as follows: To quote -

(3.) THIS observation, if not supported by any material on record duly dealt with in the preceding portion of the impugned order would plainly amount to ipse dixit.