KUNDAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE of motion to respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5.

(2.) THE principal grievance of the petitioner is that even if the acquisition of vacant agricultural land for the notified public purpose is assumed to be valid, his residential house comprising 'A' Class Construction located on the land measuring three kanal deserves to be released from acquisition. It is pointed out that the petitioner is residing in this house for the last more than 30 years. The factum of existence of residential house before issuance of notification under Section 4 of the Act has been duly admitted and acknowledged by the respondents in the report under Section 5 -A of the Act. The petitioner has placed on record photographs to substantiate his plea.

(3.) THE petitioner relies upon the Government Policy dated 26.10.2007, which, inter -alia, provides: -