HARJEET SINGH Vs. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner in this petition (since deceased and now represented by his legal representatives), sought a writ of mandamus to the respondents-Chandigarh Housing Board and the Chandigarh Administration, to deliver possession of dwelling unit No.3032/1 of the HIG-II category in Sector 44D, Chandigarh, which has not been so delivered despite the allotment letters dated 25.10.1989 and 30.04.1991, issued by the first respondent.

(2.) The facts of the case are that in response to an advertisement issued by the Chandigarh Housing Board, in the year 1997, the petitioner had applied for allotment of a dwelling unit in the HIG-II category, in Sector-44D, Chandigarh, on a hire -purchase basis. Along with the application form, he submitted the demand draft for the requisite amount and consequent upon the draw of lots held, he was issued a letter of general allotment on 25.10.1989, to the effect that he had been allocated a first floor dwelling unit as per the scheme and was further directed to deposit the consideration amount for the dwelling unit as per the schedule given in the letter.

(3.) However, as per the reply filed by the Housing Board, the petitioner, in terms of Clause 3 of the allotment letter, was required to submit an affidavit to the effect that neither he, nor his wife, nor any dependant relations, including unmarried children, owned in full or in part, on free hold/lease hold or on hire-purchase basis, a residential plot or house in the Union Territory of Chandigarh, or in the neighbouring urban estates of Mohali and Panchkula. Further, that neither he, nor his dependant relations, have acquired a house/residential site anywhere in India from the Government/semi Government agency/Municipal Committee/Government Trust at a concessional rate.