LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-531

BALDEV KAUR Vs. BIRBAL SINGH

Decided On March 13, 2014
BALDEV KAUR Appellant
V/S
BIRBAL SINGH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE challenge, in this petition preferred by petitionersdefendants - Baldev Kaur, widow of, Kashmir Singh and Jasbir Singh, sons of, Mukhtiar Singh(for brevity "the defendants"), is to the impugned order dated 18.02.2014(Annexure P -6), by virtue of which, the trial Court has permitted the respondents -plaintiffs -Birbal Singh and Beant Singh, sons of Hari Singh(for short "the plaintiffs), to amend their plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.

(2.) AFTER hearing the learned counsel for the petitionersdefendants, going through the record with his valuable assistance and after considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, there is no merit in the instant petition in this context.

(3.) EX facie, the argument of the learned counsel that, since the trial Court committed a legal mistake to permit the plaintiffs, to amend the plaint at this belated stage, so, the impugned order is liable to be set aside, lacks merit.