HANUMAN PARSHAD Vs. STATE OF U T CHANDIGARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN the light of judgment dated 12.3.2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh and order of sentence of even date, the petitioner stands convicted for the offences under Sections 279/337/338/304 -A of the Indian Penal Code and was awarded sentence in the following terms:

(2.) THE appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed by the Sessions Judge, Chandigarh vide order dated 12.12.2013. Conviction of the petitioner has been upheld but the sentence awarded by the trial Court for offence under Section 304 -A of the Indian Penal Code has been reduced from rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year to ten months.

(3.) THE present revision petition is directed against the concurrent findings of the Courts below. It would be apposite to notice that at the stage of preliminary hearing itself, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement that he is not pressing the revision petition and does not assail the conviction on merits and confined the scope of the revision petition only as regards consideration of some leniency in the quantum of sentence. Notice of motion order dated 29.1.2014 reads in the following terms: