REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Chanan Singh And Ors. Appellant

V/S

GURDEV SINGH Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

H.H. SHRI SWAMI JI OF SHRI AMAR MATT AND OTHERS V. COMMISSIONER,HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHWAR PRASAD VS. SHAMBEHARI LAL JAGANNATH [REFERRED TO]
NIRMALA BALA GHOSE IN CIVIL APPEALS NOS 966 AND 968 OF 1964 2 NIRMALA BALA GHOSE IN CIVIL APPEAL NO 967 OF 1964 VS. BALAI CHAND GHOSE IN CIVIL APPEALS NOS 966 AND 968 OF 1964 2 BALAI CHAND GHOSEIN CIVIL APPEAL NO 967 OT 1964 [REFERRED TO]
NICHHALBHAI VALLABHAI VS. JASWANTLAL ZINABHAI [REFERRED TO]
HARIHAR PRASAD SINGH VS. BALMIKI PRASAD SINGH [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR MAHESHWARI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
PRATAPRAI N KOTHARI VS. JOHN BRAGANZA [REFERRED TO]
AMLA CHAKRAVARTY VS. RANJIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY [REFERRED TO]
PADMASUNDARA RAO DEAD VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
BANARSI VS. RAM PHAL [REFERRED TO]
PRALHAD VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
MAGHAR SINGH VS. GURMEL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
VENUKURI KRISHNA REDDI AND ANR. VS. KOTA RAMI REDDI AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Applicants seek condonation of delay of two days in filing the appeal. Application is supported by an affidavit.

(2.) On being put to notice, defendants appeared and filed their written statement denying all the allegations of the plaintiff. It was pleaded that plaintiff was not in possession over the suit property. It was further pleaded that property of the defendants was adjoining to the property of plaintiff and he was trying to encroach upon the property of the defendants. Alleging the averments in the plaint to be false and frivolous, dismissal of the suit was prayed for.

(3.) On completion of pleadings of the parties, the learned trial court framed the following issues:-

Click here to view full judgment.

CHANAN SINGH AND ORS. Vs. GURDEV SINGH

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address