PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 31.03.2012 and order of sentence dated 04.04.2012, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panipat, vide which the accused/appellant Pawan Kumar, was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 363, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter called as 'IPC') and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- or in default of payment thereof, to further undergo RI for a period of one year under Section 363 IPC, RI for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- or in default of payment thereof, to further undergo RI for a period of one year under Section 376 IPC, RI for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- or in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for one month under Section 342 of IPC and RI for a period of one year with fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for one month under Section 506 IPC. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The brief facts as set out in para No. 2 of the judgment of trial Court, is reproduced as under:-

(2.) In support of the case of prosecution, it examined PW-1 EHC Jagbir Singh; PW-2 Head Constable Kaptan Singh; PW 3 Complainant Shugan Chand; PW 4 Prosecutrix; PW 5 Deepak Garg; PW 6 SI Dalel Singh; PW 7 Inspector Subhash Chander; PW 8 EHC Krishan Kumar; PW 9 Dr. Shashi Lata; PW 10 Retired Sub Inspector Nahar Singh; PW 11 Dr. Pankaj Batar and PW 12 EASI Naresh Kumar.

(3.) PW-1 EHC Jagbir Singh, prepared the scaled site plan Ex. P1 of the place of occurrence.