SURINDER DUTT Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The challenge in the present writ petition are to the orders passed by the Additional Chief Administrator, PUDA dated 1.5.2006 and dated 22.10.2012 passed by the Special Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Punjab.

(2.) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking possession of House No. 669, Phase I, Patiala, claiming that as the cancellation of allotment has been set aside, the petitioner should be entitled to possession of the said house as per the terms and conditions of the allotment letter and should be allowed to make payments accordingly.

(3.) We have perused the record of the case and heard learned counsel for the parties.