(1.) THE challenge in this revision petition, preferred by Smt. Inderjit Kaur wife of Charanjit Singh petitioner -defendant No.2 (for brevity "defendant No.2"), is to the impugned order dated 10.3.2014 (Annexure P7), by virtue of which, her application (Annexure P5) to lead additional evidence under Section 151 CPC, was dismissed by the trial Court.
(2.) AFTER hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner -defendant No.2, going through the record with his valuable help and considering the entire matter deeply, to my mind, there is no merit in the instant revision petition in this context.
(3.) EX facie, the argument of learned counsel that since the adequate opportunities were not granted to petitioner -defendant No.2, so, the trial Court committed the legal mistake to dismiss her application, to lead additional evidence, is not only devoid of merit but misplaced as well.