PHULLA Vs. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner and the private respondents are landlord and tenant in relation to the property. The petitioner has sought for ejectment on the ground of non -payment of batai for the land measuring 36 kanals 12 marlas situate in Village Urlana Khurd, Tehsil Panipat, District Karnal. The ground of eviction was alleged default in payment of rent from Rabi 1981 to Kharif 1983.

(2.) WHEN the Assistant Collector dismissed the ejectment application, the Collector reversed the decision and ordered ejectment. The Commissioner, Ambala, reversed the decision accepting the tenant's contention that he had paid the rent but this was again set aside by the Financial Commissioner holding that the rent had not been proved to have been paid. The ultimate order that prevailed was of the Financial Commissioner who held that the rent had not been paid. It is this order that remains for consideration before this court.

(3.) THE writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.