VINOD LUTHRA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a petition for anticipatory bail in FIR No.388 dated 10.12.2013, under Sections 420 of Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Sadar, Thanesar, District Kurukshetra.

(2.) HEARING has been provided.

(3.) THE petitioner, a resident of Amritsar has a son named Karan Luthra, who is residing in Australia. Yashpal Singh son of complainant Dharam Singh after completing his schooling had gone to Australia for further education where he came in contact with said Karan Luthra son of the petitioner. He persuaded son of the complainant to get permanent residency and sought Rs.16,00,000/ - for getting his work done. Yashpal Singh son of the complainant was reluctant as he wanted to talk to his father who was residing in District Kurukshetra and was also not in possession of the requisite amount demanded by the non - applicant accused Karan Luthra son of the petitioner. Non -applicant accused Karan Luthra got in touch with the petitioner i.e. his father, and asked him to get money from the complainant at Kurukshetra. The complainant was informed about these developments on phone.