(1.) BY this order I shall dispose of Civil Revision Nos.4613 to 4619 of 2010 as they involve commonality of facts and law. The petitioner, who is landlord, sought the eviction of respondents on the grounds of non -payment of rent and personal necessity. Both the learned Rent Controller and the Appellate Court non -suited him. Before this Court the only ground urged is regarding personal necessity which has been negated by the courts below.
(2.) A perusal of the impugned orders would show that the claim of the petitioner has been discarded on the following grounds :
(3.) THE respondent however justifies the orders of the courts below.