MAHADEV ENTERPRISES Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been preferred by the assessee under section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (in short "the Act") against the orders dated December 14, 2010 (annexure AT), dated October 12, 2012 (annexure A2) and dated September 17, 2013 (annexure A4) passed by the Haryana Tax Tribunal, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), claiming the following substantial questions of law:

(2.) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(3.) THE learned counsel for the appellant submitted that no notice for disposal of remand case was sent to the appellant and, therefore, the assessee could not produce the invoices and forms VAT C -4. It was urged that the appellant is in possession of these forms and the assessee be permitted to submit the same before the Assessing Authority.