STATE OF HARYANA Vs. RAM PYARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE State of Haryana has filed this application (CRM -A No.241 -MA of 2014) under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13.9.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat, whereby all the three accused (respondents No.1 to 3 herein) have been acquitted from the charges framed against them under Sections 498 -A, 406, 304 -B and in alternative under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C.

(2.) THOUGH this application for grant of leave is barred by limitation, and along with it, the applicant/State has filed an application (CRM No.5305 of 2014) for condonation of 57 days delay in filing the application for grant of leave to appeal, yet without taking the said delay into consideration, we have heard the learned counsel for the applicant on merits.

(3.) COMPLAINANT -Ved Ram has also filed CRA No.D -1515 -DB of 2013 under Section 372 Cr.P.C. against acquittal of the aforesaid accused. We have also heard the learned counsel for the complainant and have gone through the record of the case which has been requisitioned and decided to dispose of both the cases by this judgment.