ANOOPIKA RANDHAWA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PETITIONER has approached this Court impugning the order dated 22.04.2014 (Annexure P -19) passed by the Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Haryana -respondent No. 2, vide which recovery of the salary for the period of 187 days is being sought to be made from her.

(2.) AFTER arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the only person who is a bread winner in the family and, therefore, if the recovery is effected in one go, she would have nothing to survive on and accordingly prays that a lenient view may be taken in this regard.

(3.) IT has been brought to the notice of the Court that because of the pendency of the earlier writ petition preferred by the petitioner, she has not been granted the annual increment which she would have been otherwise entitled to and the service book is not complete on this count. The needful be also done prior to effecting the recovery as ordered by this Court.