MALKIAT SINGH Vs. SANDEEP KUMAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner impugns the order dated 12.3.2014 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Chandigarh by which the plea of the landlord was accepted to oust the petitioner from the tenanted premises.

(2.) THE respondent/landlord initiated proceedings to seek eviction of the petitioner from the demised premises for setting up a real estate business for his son and himself. It was pleaded that the petitioner along with his son were already in this business and they were residing in rented premises and thus, required the demised premises. The plea of material alterations was also taken to contend that the tenant had made one pucca room and verandah without the consent of the landlord. It was also pleaded that the respondent is a continuous nuisance and various criminal cases have been filed against him. It was next contended that the tenant owns various properties in Chandigarh including House No.781/1 near Manimajra and he has sold another plot in Mauli Jagran. The present petitioner who is the tenant, disputed all the grounds and the parties went to trial on the following issues : -

(3.) THE learned Rent Controller dismissed the petition which was accepted by the learned Appellate Authority.