(1.) THE applicant has sought review of the order dated 21.04.2014, inter alia, on the ground that even though the matter has been remanded twice by this Court but on each occasion the Commissioner has failed to comply with the directions of this Court and that the Commissioner has passed an order in open Court but the same could not have been modified except in respect of clerical mistake.
(2.) WE have heard petitioner and Mr. Sharma and find that there is no error apparent on record which may warrant review of the order.
(3.) THE order of remand was passed on the consent of the counsel for the parties. Therefore, we do not find any error apparent on record which may warrant review of the order dated 21.04.2014.