LAXMI ENTERPRISES Vs. MAA SHEETLA INDUSTRIES

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have heard counsel for the the accused and complainant on quantum of sentence.

(2.) COUNSEL for the accused would contend that Anita Goyal, proprietor of M/s Maa Sheetla Industries accused No. 1 has faced the criminal proceedings for a period of more than ten years. She had to engage counsel for four times as the matter was carried in appeal twice before this Court and remained pending before the trial Court on two occasions. She is a household lady having a family consisting of her husband and two children. It is prayed that the accused is ready to compensate the complainant and lenient view may be taken.

(3.) I have given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions made by Counsel for the parties.