ZILE SINGH MEHLA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Secretary to Government Haryana Education Department vide his Memo No. 10/6779-Edu.III(4) dated 5.2.1980 addressed to the Director of Public Instructions, Haryana, Chandigarh, communicated that consequent upon the judgment of this Court, the following decisions have been taken:

(2.) In the reply filed on behalf of the respondents it is submitted that as the orders have been issued in compliance of the judgment in Civil Writ Petition No. 783 of 1979, nc writ can be issued against the respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners were not eligible for regularisation of their services under policy decision dated 1.7.1980. As was the matter in controversy in C.W.P. No. 1561 of 1980, it is stated that the teachers/masters who did not fulfil the conditions contained in letter dated 1.7.1980 were not eligible for regularisation with the result that all such teachers were treated as adhoc employees. It is further submitted that apprehension of passing of termination orders against them was wrong and baseless. A person working on adhoc basis does not acquire any right to the post and his services are terminable at any time without assigning any reason. It is again contended that in compliance to the directions of this Court the termination of services of the petitioners have been stayed till further orders.

(3.) While arguing the case the counsel for the respondents submitted that services of the petitioners are liable to be terminated consequent upon the judgment of this Court for which no directions can be issued against the respondents. Reliance has been placed upon the judgment of this Court delivered in Civil Writ Petition No. 783 of 1979. In order to appreciate the consequences of the orders passed by this Court in C.W.P. No. 783 of 1979 it is pertinent to have a careful perusal of the order sought to be relied upon by the respondents, which is reproduced below: