NIAB SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Naib Singh has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for directing the respondents to provide B class facilities to the petitioner according to Para 576-A of the Punjab Jail Manual (1975 Edition).

(2.) Petitioner is undergoing imprisonment for life in Central Jail Ferozepur. During his tenure in jail, he did not commit any jail offence and no jail punishment had ever been awarded to him. He has moved this petition for grant of B Class facilities in the jail on the ground that he was an income-tax payee and he is a partner in a firm of Commission Agents M/ s. Mathura Dass Chaman Lal at Moga and is also a partner in a firm M/s. Guru Nanak Rice Mills at Moga. Petitioner is enjoying a social status by virtue of being income-tax payee. He belongs to well to-do family and was used to a superior way of living. Petitioner is a respectable member of the society and enjoys good reputation. Thus, he is entitled to B Class facilities by virtue of para No. 576-A (2) of the Punjab Jail Manual. Prayer of the petitioner was opposed by the respondents and it was contended that he was not entitled to B Class facilities. Under the Government instructions, it has been stated in para 10 of the written statement that the provision contained in para 576(A)(2) of Punjab Jail Manual stands superseded by the instructions issued by the Government from time to time. The Government has been amending these instructions by issuing fresh instructions and presently 'B' Class is granted to those prisoners who fulfils any of the following conditions :

(3.) Mr. M. S. Cheema, Advocate, for the petitioner has contended that in the preface to the Punjab Jail Manual (1975 Edition) paragraphs of the Manual against which a black line (side line) appears are in substance, either quotations from the law or from the Rules having force of law while the portions of the Manual without a black line (side line) are executive instructions which have been issued by the Government of India, Local Government or the Inspector General with the sanction and approval from the Local Government and Para 576-A is one of those paragraphs of the manual against which a black line (side line) appears and this paragraph has the force of law. Therefore, the State Government can not supersede Para 576-A by issuing the executive instructions. In support of his argument, he has relied upon Sadhu Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1984 SC 739 . It has been held by the Supreme Court that "Secondly, this position had been sufficiently clarified at two places in the Punjab Jail Manual (1975 edition) itself. In the preface to that edition, it has been clearly stated that the Paragraphs of the Manual against which a black line (side line) appears are in substance, either quotations from the Law or from the Rules having the force of the law while the portions of the Manual without a black line (side line) are executive instructions which from time to time been issued by the Government of India, Local Government or the Inspector General with the sanction and approval from the Local Government and Para 516-B is not side-lined by any black line. "