STATE OF HARYANA Vs. A. K. JAIN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IDENTICAL questions of law and fact are involved in these 26 criminal revisions. These are proposed to be disposed of by this common judgment. Facts first.

(2.) 26 workmen, private respondents herein were employed with M/s. Ajay Udyog (P) Ltd., MIE, Bahadurgarh (Rohtak). They were retrenched by the employer under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). Each one of them raised an industrial dispute. Government of Haryana being of the opinion that an industrial dispute existed, referred the dispute in each case to the Labour Court, Rohtak under Section 10(1)(c) of the Act. The said Court gave awards which were published in the Govt. Gazettee on different dates.

(3.) IT is that identical order of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bahadurgarh which has been challenged before this Court under Section 401 Cr.P.C. in each of these 26 Revision Petitions and which requires examination by this Court of its sustainability.