REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JETINDER PAL SINGH Appellant

V/S

STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BARIUM CHEMICALS LIMITED VS. COMPANY LAW BOARD [REFERRED TO]
ROHTAS INDUSTRIES VS. S D AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS VS. CHARAN DAS MALHOTRA [REFERRED TO]
MANEKA GANDHI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SWADESHI COTTON MILLS NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION UNION OF INDIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
U P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. LABOUR COURT 1 U P KANPUR [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL INLAND WATER TRANSPORT CORPORATION LIMITED VS. BROJO NATH GANGULY / TARUN KANTI SENGUPTA [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV SINGH VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHAM GUPTA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
RANBIR KUMAR ARORA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE BHIWANI VS. MUNSHI [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 445/1983 (Jatinder Pal Singh v. State of Haryana; 3127/1983 (Mohinder Kumar v. State of Haryana; and 27/1983 (Vinod Kumar Jain v. State of Haryana) are being disposed of by a common judgement as common question of law and fact is involved therein.

(2.) The only question surviving for consideration, as directed by the Apex Court vide its judgement of 5/03/1987 relates to the constitutional validity of S. 44-A of the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 as enforced in Haryana (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and the notifications issued from time to time under the proviso to the said Section granting extension of the period for the completion of the scheme.

(3.) The relevant facts for appreciation of the quest on involved briefly are that vide notifications Nos. :

Click here to view full judgment.

JETINDER PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address