LAWS(P&H)-1983-8-63

DIDAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On August 25, 1983
DIDAR SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) TWO appellants, namely, Didar Singh and Bhagwan Singh have been convicted and sentenced as under by the Additional Sessions judge, Bhatinda, vide his order dated 31st July, 1982. (1) Didar Singh appellant was convicted and sentenced under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code to rigorous imprisonment for four years and a fine of Rs. 500/-; in default, further rigorous imprisonment for three months. (2) Bhagwan Singh appellant was convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. Two co-accused of the appellants, namely, Teja Singh and Gola Singh were also tried along with them but were acquitted as the case against them was not found to be free from doubt.

(2.) THE prosecution case as set out by Balbir Singh PW 2, as injured witness and the first informant, is that, according to the warabandi, he had to take his turn of water after Bhagwan Singh appellant. On the day of occurrence, i.e. 12th December, 1980, Bhagwan Singh appellant had given his turn of water to Didar Singh appellant. That turn of water was to end at 7.25 a.m. At that time Bhagwan Singh appellant, Tejwant Singh, Teja Singh and Gola Singh co-accused of the appellants (since acquitted) and Didar Singh were irrigating their field. At 7.15 a.m. Balbir Singh PW asked his siri Banta Singh to divert the water from the field of Didar Singh appellant ten minutes prior to the time when the turn of Didar Singh was to finish. When Banta Singh to divert the water, Didar Singh appellant told him that he could not divert the water before 7.25 a.m. and that in case he tried to do so he would fire at him. Banta Singh is alleged to have gone back out of fear. balbir Singh PW 2 himself went there with a kassi and tried to divert the water. He was also given the same warning but in spite of that he tried to divert water. Bhagwan Singh appellant gave a lathi blow which hit Balbir Singh on his left hand. Didar Singh appellant, snatched the gun from him and caused an injury on the leg of Gola Singh accused with the butt of the gun, which resulted in the fracture of the leg. According to Balbir Singh, this occurrence was witnessed by Baru Singh besides Balwant Singh. On a raula being raised by Balwant Singh and Baru Singh PWs appellants and their co-accused went away from the spot, Balwant Singh and Baru Singh took the injured to his house. In a tractor trolley of one Kartar Singh he was then removed to the bus stand. They carried the gun of Didary Singh, Exhibit P2, with them. The same was handed over to a Constable by Balbir Singh at the bus stand of village Jhunir. He also handed over live cartridge Exhibit P3 to the constable. The empty had been thrown on the spot by Balbir Singh. He reached the hospital at Mansa at 9.45 a.m., and was medically thereby Dr. Kewal Kumar Singla PW 1 at 9.45 a.m. on the day of occurrence who found the following injuries on his person :-

(3.) APART from the medical evidence, the prosecution, in order to bring home the charges to the appellants, examined the following witnesses. Balbir Singh PW 2 is the injured witness and first informant. The evidence of PW 3 head Constable Prem Singh, PW 4 Moharrir Head Constable Subash Chand, PW 5 Assistant Moharrir Head Constable Harprit Singh, PW 6 Constable Harnek Singh, PW 7 Constable Gurnam Singh and PW 8 constable Chhota Singh is of a formal nature. PW 9 Baru Singh, a close relation of the injured, is another eye-witness. PW 10 Balkar Singh Sub-Inspector and PW 11 Thakkar Singh Sub-Inspector investigated the case.