LAWS(P&H)-1983-10-121

OM PARKASH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On October 14, 1983
OM PARKASH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner is the owner of land measuring 16 Kanals comprised in Khasra No. 10 (8 Kanals 0 Marla and 11 (8 Kanals 0 Marla) of Rectangle No. 31 situate in the revenue estate of Ratgal, Tehsil Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Originally, the petitioner was the owner of 176 Kanals of land in this village out of which 160 Kanals had been acquired by the State from time to time and he is left with only the aforesaid 16 Kanals of land which is in his possession. The petitioner submitted an application to the Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana, under the Controlled Areas Act for permitting him to use the aforesaid lands for residential purposes, but the prayer was declined and his appeal to the Director was also rejected.

(2.) It is further averred in the petition that the State of Haryana issued a notification No. LAC(P)-72/NTLA/2124, dated 3rd November, 1972, published in the Haryana Government Gazette (Extraordinary) dated 3rd November, 1972, under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in respect of 3000 acres of land situated in villages Bazidpur, Bir Pipli, Pipli, Devidaspura, Umri, Palwal, Sunderpur, Dera Kalan, Ratgal and Dera Khurd of Tehsil Thanesar, District Karnal, now District Kurukshetra. In respect of village Ratgal, the notification mentioned the area of acquisition to be 710-13 acres, thereby covering the entire land of the petitioner. Another notification No. 2133 dated 3rd November, 1972, was issued by the Local Government Department of the State whereby besides the area situated in other villages, land measuring 710.13 acres which was the total area of village Ratgal, was sought to be acquired.

(3.) It is further stated that since the issuance of notification dated 3rd November, 1972, respondent No. 1 has been issuing successive notifications under section 4 of the Act for acquiring the above referred lands of the petitioner. The last notification which had been issued by respondent No. 1 in this respect was dated 11th March, 1981, under which besides the lands situated in other villages 51-39 acres of land of village Ratgal including the disputed land of the petitioner was sought to be acquired for development and utilization of land as City Centre for Sector 10.The petitioner filed his objections dated 1st April, 1981 under section 5-A of the Act but those objections have not been decided as no intimation was received by the petitioner. It is on the basis of the aforesaid averments that the petitioner has called in question the legality of the notifications.