RANJIT SINGH Vs. AMARJIT SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision petition has been filed by tenant Ranjit Singh against the judgment of the Appellate Authority, Patiala, dated May 4, 1981, whereby the decision of the Rent Controller was reversed and ejectment order was passed against the petitioner in favour of the respondent-landlord Amarjit Singh.

(2.) AMARJIT Singh filed ejectment application against Ranjit Singh on the plea that he had let out a rented land to Ranjit Singh on a monthly rent of Rs. 50/- and that he now requires the rented for his own personal use and occupation. Ranjit Singh while contesting the ejectment application denied the tenancy premises to be rented land. He contended that the premises containing three rooms and an open space had been taken on rent by him. He did not admit that Amarjit Singh requires the tenancy premises for his personal use.

(3.) THE learned petitioner's counsel has raised two points for consideration. Firstly, the tenancy premises are not vacant land but three rooms and some vacant site and secondly that the landlord's requirement of the tenancy premises is not proved to be bonafide. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length on these two points.