RAM RATTAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner was elected as Director of the Chhachhrauli Cane Growers Co-operative Society, Limited Chhachhrauli (hereinafter referred to as the Society), on the 10th April, 1971. On 18 September, 1973, the members of the managing committee of the Society passed resolutions whereby the petitioner was removed from the membership of the committee. His grievance is that under section 26-B(2) of the Punjab Co- operative Societies Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), he is entitled to hold office for a period of three years from the date of his election. According to him, the resolution of the managing committee being opposed to the mandatory provisions of the statute, is null and void.

(2.) In the return filed on behalf of respondent No. 4, it has been mentioned that according to the bye-laws of the Society, every person has to members of the managing committee. For the year, in dispute, the petitioner was not able to get himself elected as delegate and so he could not remain a Director. The other point raised is that the petitioner was a defaulter and under the bye-laws of the Society, a defaulter could not remain a member of the managing committee. The latter position is, however, hotly contested by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(3.) Section 8(c) of the Act lays down that if the proposed bye-laws of the society are not contrary to the provisions of the Act and the rules, the Registrar may register the society and its bye-laws. Section 10 of the Act inter alia lays down that the Registrar may suo motu revise the bye-laws of a Society in order to bring them in conformity with the provisions of the Act. From these provisions of law, it is obvious that the bye-laws cannot provide for anything which runs counter to the express provisions of the statute. Even otherwise, it is a settled principles of law that neither the rules; nor the action taken under the rules can travel outside the ambit of the statutory provisions. In this view of the matter, the bye-laws of the Society which curtail the period of membership of the Society cannot be treated as valid. For the same reasons, the resolution passed by the managing committee of respondent No. 4, has to be struck down, and I order accordingly.