BALWAN SINGH DAGAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.305, dtd. 11/10/2017 at Police Station Julana, Jind, under Ss. 420, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code.

(2.) The allegations, in nutshell are that Balwan Singh Dagar (petitioner) was having a saving bank account with Oriental Bank of Commerce, Julana, District Jind. It is alleged that a cheque bearing No.262279 dtd. 10/7/2017 amounting to Rs.1,20,75,487.00 was purported to have been issued by "SBI Life Insurance Company" and the same was submitted by him in the drop box with a pay in slip of the same date for credit to his bank account. The said branch entered the cheque and sent the same for collection to State Bank of India, Branch Julana on 11/7/2017. However, on 14/7/2017, the said cheque was returned by SBI, Julana with the reason that "amount in words and figures differed and title of the cheque was doubtful". The bank, thus, investigated the matter. A copy of e-mail dtd. 13/7/2017 (Annexure P-5) received from SBI Life Insurance Company to SBI, Julana was received vide which SBI, Julana was requested not to honour the cheque as it was issued for Rs.19.00 only on 6/5/2017 in favour of one Ms. Babita Devi. It was also mentioned therein that font used in the said cheque was incorrect and IFSC code mentioned was also wrong. It was a high value cheque with incorrect facsimile signature. Upon request of the bank, FIR was registered and investigation ensued. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner committed a fraud as cheque No.262279, dtd. 6/5/2017 for Rs.19.00 in the name of Ms. Babita Devi was manipulated. In the said cheque, petitioner altered the amount of Rs.1,20,75,485.00 in words but in figures the amount was written as Rs.1,20,75,487.00.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that the FIR came to be lodged after the petitioner had instituted a complaint under Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act against SBI Life Insurance Company on account of dishonour of the cheque in question. Learned counsel has further submitted that the matter, in any case, is based on documentary evidence and since the cheque in question had already been taken into possession by the police, which had been taken from the Court, where the proceedings regarding complaint under Sec. 138 of N.I. Act was pending, it would not be a case where detention of the petitioner would serve any purpose particularly when challan already stands presented.