LAWS(P&H)-2013-1-36

AMAR NATH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Decided On January 10, 2013
AMAR NATH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) LEARNED State counsel has filed affidavit of Shri Resham Singh, Deputy Superintendent, District Prison, Karnal mentioning the period of imprisonment undergone by the applicant/appellant-Amar Nath. The same is taken on record.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(3.) THE police report in the case against the applicant/appellant was filed for the offences under Sections 306 and 201 IPC. The learned trial Court, however, framed charges against him for the offences under Sections 304-B and 302 IPC. After trial the learned trial Court found the offence under Section 304-B IPC to be not made out. The applicant/appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC.