VISHAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case arising out of FIR No. 99 dated 12.4.2012, registered at Police Station City, Ferozepur, under Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 34 IPC.

(2.) The petitioner has been given sufficient opportunities to settle the dispute with his estranged wife on an undertaking furnished by him on the basis of which notice of motion was issued. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant-respondent submits that despite the undertaking given by the petitioner, he has not arranged for a separate accommodation so as to give a new lease of life to the marriage and in fact the petitioner has no intention to honour his undertaking. A reference to zimni orders passed on different dates would be relevant:-

(3.) Today the learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner has not been able to comply with this undertaking given before the Court.