(1.) Shri Vivek Sharma contends that all the grounds taken up in the petition for quashing of complaint, Annexure P-1, involve disputed questions of facts which can be decided by the trial court after recording of evidence, and in so far as the question of correctness of summoning order dated 12.7.1994, Annexure P-2, is concerned, the same is revisable and revision lies before the Sessions Judge.
(2.) It is well settled law that the High Court will not enter into enquiry of disputed facts. Besides, when specific remedy of revision challenging the correctness of the summoning order is available to the petitioner, inherents power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, cannot be invoked for quashing the same.