(1.) This petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 22-2-2003 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jalandhar dismissing the application of the husband-petitioner in which prayer was made for getting the wife-respondent medically examined in order to prove her virginity.
(2.) The wife-respondent has filed a petition before the Additional District Judge under Sections 11 and 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a decree of nullity of marriage, inter alia, on the ground that the marriage has never been consummated. The husband-petitioner has taken the defence that the marriage has been consummated and he is not impotent. In order to prove that the wife-respondent is not virgin, the husband-petitioner filed an application for her medical examination which has been declined.
(3.) Mr. G. P. S. Bal, learned counsel for the husband-petitioner has vehemently argued that refusal of medical examination by the wife-respondent is a material fact and the Court should not have dismissed the application filed by the husband-petitioner. According to the learned counsel, the medical examination of the wife-respondent would go a long way to prove the fact whether the marriage is consummated or not. In support of his submission, the learned counsel has placed reliance on paragraph 74 of a judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Sharda v. Dharmpal (2003) 3 JT (SC) 399 .