LAWS(P&H)-2003-11-45

NANAK SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Decided On November 19, 2003
NANAK SINGH Appellant
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal has been filed by Nanak Singh against the order dated 20.8.1981 passed by the trial Judge imposing penalty of Rs. 7000/- in the proceedings under Sections 446 Cr.P.C.

(2.) NANAK Singh-appellant had stood surety for Ranjit Singh-accused in the case State v. Kulwant Singh etc. under Section 307/34 IPC vide FIR No. 253 of 1987 of Police Station Tanda. Nanak Singh had furnished surety bond in the sum of Rs. 7000/- for accused Ranjit Singh. Accused Ranjit Singh jumped bail on 27.3.1991 and was declared a proclaimed offender. Notice under Section 446 Cr.P.C. was served upon the appellant-Nanak Singh on 14.6.1991. Nanak Singh- appellant (surety) sought time to locate the accused and to produce him before the Court and he was granted time till 20.8.1991. On 20.8.1991, Nanak Singh- surety appeared before the trial Court and submitted that he was unable to trace accused-Ranjit Singh and/or to produce him in the Court. Resultantly, the learned trial Court imposed penalty of Rs. 7000/- against Nanak Singh- surety. On the request made by Nanak Singh-surety, he was given one month's time to make the payment. This order was passed by the learned trial Court on 20.8.1991. Aggrieved against the same, Nanak Singh-surety has filed the present appeal in this Court.

(3.) I have heard learned counsel for the State and have gone through the record carefully.