(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29.4.1986 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, by which the appeal of the plaintiff-appellant was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 7.1.1985 passed by the trial Court (dismissing the suit of the plaintiff-appellant) was upheld.
(2.) The plaintiff-appellant was a Conductor in the Punjab Roadways, Jalandhar. His services were terminated by the General Manager, Punjab Roadways, Jalandhar-2, vide order dated 13.4.1983. He had filed an appeal before the Divisional Manager, Punjab Roadways, Jalandhar which was also dismissed, vide order dated 31.10.1983.
(3.) The case of the plaintiff-appellant is that he was issued a charge-sheet about embezzlement to the Government money, to which he filed a reply, but nobody applied his mind to the explanation submitted by him. The plaintiff-appellant challenged the legality and validity of the impugned order, inter alia, pleading that the charge-sheet issued to the plaintiff did not contain sufficient facts and material; that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are not based on evidence; that the extraneous matters and documents were taken into consideration by the Enquiry Officer and punishing authority; that the enquiry was not conducted as per provisions of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules); that the show-cause notice issued to the plaintiff was also defective; and that the reply of the plaintiff to the show-cause notice was also not considered by the punishing authority; that the plaintiff served a notice under Sec. 80, Code of Civil Procedure, on the defendant, but of no avail; and that, therefore, the plaintiff had to file the suit.