GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH & OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This order shall dispose of aforementioned three applications, whereby the applicant-petitioner(s) have sought review of the judgment passed by this Court on 06.02.2012 on the following grounds:

(2.) We do not find any merit in any of the arguments raised by the learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner except to correct inadvertant mistake at page 17 of the order. In fact, the present order be read in continuation of earlier order passed by this Court on 06.02.2012.

(3.) The argument that Rule 9 & 9(A) of the Chandigarh Sale of (Site & Building) Rules, 1960 and Rule 17 of Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973 have been challenged, but it has been wrongly recorded in the order dated 06.02.2012 that there is no challenge to such Rules. We find that such fact recorded therein is on account of inadvertant mistake. Therefore, the words "...We may record that there is no challenge to the framing of Rule 9 restricting the use of a building in a particular manner or Section 4 of the Act, empowering the Chief Administrator to issue directions in respect of use of the site..." appearing at page No.17 of the order requires to be deleted. Ordered accordingly.