SAT PAL Vs. JOGINDER SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Present application has been filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC seeking review of the judgment pronounced on 23 rd December, 2011, whereby a bunch of regular second appeals was decided. The main thrust of the counsel seeking review is that an application bearing Civil Misc. No.40-C of 2010, which was filed to amend the written statement, has not been decided by the Hon'ble Court but the main appeal has been disposed of. The amendment was sought to incorporate the following plea:

(2.) Learned senior counsel has submitted that by not considering the application for amendment of the written statement filed to the suit, following three vital arguments have escaped attention of this Court:

(3.) The submissions made by learned senior counsel are not tenable, as a perusal of the judgment dated 23 rd December, 2011 demonstrates that in fact all the above arguments had been comprehensively dealt with. But only a formal order of disposing of the amendment application remained to be passed. Thus, while deciding the present application for review, the application seeking amendment of the written statement to the suit also deserves dismissal. However, to allay the any kind of misconception, it will be apposite to quote from the judgment and otherwise from the various orders passed to show as to how the pleas raised and arguments advanced had been dealt with.