SUKHBIR KAUR Vs. KRISHAN AVTAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CM No.4721-C of 2012 Allowed as prayed for. CM No.4722-C of 2012

(2.) THE application is allowed and Annexures A-1 to A-3 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main Case

(3.) THE defendants broadly controverted the plaint averments. THE defendants denied execution of impugned agreement as well as receipt of earnest money. THE defendants pleaded that on 21.04.2006, the plaintiff asked defendants No.2 and 3 to bring defendants No.1 and 4 also to attest the sale deed as witnesses so that defendants No.1 and 4 as cosharers may not object to the sale deed to be executed by defendants No.2 and 3. Accordingly defendants No.2 and 3 executed sale deed dated 21.04.2006 and at that time, the plaintiff in clever manner also obtained thumb impressions of defendants No.1 and 4 along with defendants No.2 and 3 on some stamp papers and the same were signed under the impression of being part of the sale deed dated 21.04.2006.