TANVI Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) CRIMINAL Misc. No.35264 of 2012 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Criminal miscellaneous application stands disposed of. Criminal Misc. No. M-17834 of 2012

(2.) BOTH the petitiones are present in the Court and are identified by their counsel.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are major in terms of the documents appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2. They have married each other of their own free will. Photographs of the marriage are appended as Annexure P-3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners approached the Superintendent of Police, Kaithal-respondent No.3 but no action has been taken and the petitioners are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.