JAGDISH CHANDER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner has approached this Court praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the Military service benefit to the petitioner towards increments and other pensionary benefits from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 23.5.1978 instead of 1.1.1987 i.e. the date of regular appointment or any other appropriate writ, order or direction. Counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner is not pressing the claim for increments and seniority, which he had claimed in the writ petition from 23.5.1978 i.e. the initial date of his appointment but contends that for the grant of pensionary benefits, the date of his initial appointment i.e. 23.5.1978 is to be taken into consideration instead of 1.1.1987 which is the date of his regularization. He presses this claim on the basis of the amendment brought about by the respondents in Clause (iii) of Rule 4 of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the 1965 Rules), vide notification dated 22..1976, according to which the nature of appointment was changed from 'permanent service or post' to 'service or post'. With the classification of "permanent" having been removed, the appointment of the petitioner on work-charge basis from 23.5.1978 till the date of his regularization i.e. 1.1.1987 is to be counted towards the grant of pensionary benefits. It is on this basis that the prayer for grant of this period for pensionary benefits is made.

(2.) Counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, submits that as per Rule 4(A) of the 1965 Rules as amended by notification dated 22.07.2005, petitioner is entitled to the benefit of military service for the purpose of increments and seniority from the date of his regular appointment. He, on this corollary, states that the petitioner shall not be entitled to the counting of his work charge service which he had rendered prior to the date of his regularization for the grant of pensionary benefits also. The said period is not to be counted for the grant of pensionary benefits and, therefore, he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

(3.) I have considered the submissions made by the counsel for the parties and with their assistance have gone through the records of the case. Government of Haryana vide notification dated 22.3.1976 adopted the 1965 Rules which were deemed to have come into force w.e.f. 1.11.1966. Rule 4 of these Rules, then read as follows:-