RAM RATTAN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE instant petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure ('Cr.P.C. for short) for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.47 dated 16.05.2012 under Section 306/34 IPC registered at Police Station Buria, District Yamuna Nagar.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners vehemently contended that they have been falsely implicated in the present case. Meena-daughter of petitioner No.1 who was married with the deceased-Jai Chand was not suffering from any ailment as wrongly alleged in the FIR. He also submitted that since the dispute was going on between both the families and deceased wanted to rehabilitate the daughter of petitioner No.1. However, his mother i.e. complainant was opposing because of her greed for dowry. The deceased was unable to bear the tension because of which he committed suicide.

(3.) THE above said allegations show that daughter of petitioner No.1 was suffering from some ailment at the time of her marriage which was allegedly concealed by the petitioners. Thereafter, the dispute between both the families started. Panchayat was convened. Further allegations against the petitioners are that they had been putting pressure on the deceased for giving Rs. 6 lacs. The allegations recorded in the FIR are as under: