GURMAIL SINGH Vs. SUPERINTENDING CANAL OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has a grievance against the prayer of the private respondents allowed shifting of outlet from Moga No. 26300-L Rajbaha Muradwala Minor to a point in between the line of Muraba No. 80 and 90 i.e. 5 killas downstream. The scheme was prepared in the year 2008 and the order shifting the Moga from point 'A' to 'B' as shown in the site plan was passed. This was done as private respondents did not get proper irrigation from the outlet as the earlier outlet was on to one side of the chak.

(2.) HAVING remained unsuccessful before DCO and SCO, the petitioner earlier approached this Court, when the case was remanded to the SCO for fresh consideration after keeping in mind the report given by the DCO. The parties appearing before SCO after remand. The SCO took help of the counsel appointed amicus curiae with the concurrence of the parties. The said Advocate, accordingly, visited the spot in the presence both the parties and gave his inspection report. Relying on this inspection report, the SCO has now passed the fresh order shifting Moga from point A to B.

(3.) THIS writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The parties through their counsel are directed to appear before SCO on