RAJ SINGH Vs. RAJBALA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALLOWED as prayed for. Main Case : Defendants have filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning orders of both the courts below, whereby temporary injunction has been granted to the respondent-plaintiff Rajbala.

(2.) PLAINTIFF filed suit alleging that she has purchased plot measuring 01 kanal 09 marlas out of khasra no. 341 vide two sale deeds dated 06.01.2006 and is owner in possession thereof and has enclosed the same with boundary walls. The defendants, without any right, title or interest, allegedly threatened to demolish the wall, depicted by letters AF in the site plan (Annexure P-6) and to dispossess the plaintiff therefrom. Plaintiff sought injunction restraining the defendants from doing so. By moving separate application, temporary injunction to this effect was also claimed during pendency of the suit.

(3.) THERE is no serious dispute regarding the property purchased by the plaintiff. However, dispute is whether the plaintiff has made encroachment on any part of the public street or not. Even if the plaintiff has allegedly made encroachment on part of the public street, the only remedy with the defendants or other villagers or Gram Panchayat is to seek ejectment of the plaintiff from the encroached portion in due course of law.