PARMOD KUMAR @ SONA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present appeal has been filed by appellant Parmod Kumar @ Sona, against the judgment/order dated 27.2.2001, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar convicted accused Parmod Kumar @ Sona under section 307 Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- or, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, whereas, co-accused Harchand Singh @ Bau was convicted under section 307/34 Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Under Section 450 IPC, both the accused were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- or, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The brief facts of the case stand reflected in para 2 of the judgment of the Learned trial Court, are re-produced as under:-

(2.) To substantiate its allegations, the prosecution examined PW 1, Dr. Inderjit Singh Bagga, who examined the injured on 1.7.1997 and gave his opinion on application Ex. PC/1.

(3.) PW 2, Dr. Jayant Chawla, Junior Resident, Chawla Hospital, examined the injured on 28.6.1997 (day of occurrence) and conducted the operation. Ex. PB is the operation notes. Ex. PD is the bed head ticket of the patient.