SUNITA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This judgment shall dispose of Crl. A. No. 169-DB of 2008, Crl. A. No. 369-SB of 2008 and Crl. A. No. 2006-SB of 2008, as all these appeals arise out of common impugned judgement of conviction and sentence passed by trial Court. Accused Parveen son of Nikka Ram and accused Sita Ram were convicted under Section 201 IPC and accused Sunita was convicted under Section 302 and 201 IPC. Aggrieved by the judgement of conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court they have preferred independent appeals.

(2.) Sh. Sukhdev Parmar who entered appearance for the accused-appellant Sita Ram was appointed as Amicus Curiae for the other two accused-appellants also, as no counsel on their side was prepared to argue the case.

(3.) The brief case of the prosecution is as follows:-