KAWALJIT SINGH WALIA Vs. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Written statement filed on behalf of behalf of respondents No.7 along with the application is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at appropriate place.

(2.) Arguments have been heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to enquiry report which is in his favour whereas the other side has referred to the report of FSL, which has been given in favour of respondent No. 6. Under the circumstances, there are various disputed questions of fact which arises in this petition. At this stage, it would be appropriate to reproduce Section 57 of the Act which reads as under:

(3.) In view of the above, since the disputed questions of facts are involved herein, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedy of appeal available to him. Learned counsel for the respondents state that in case an appeal is filed before the appellate authority within a period of thirty days from today, then, no question with regard to its limitation shall be raised. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by observing that in case the petitioner files an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of thirty days from today, the same shall be adjudicated by the appellate authority on merits without going into the question of limitation.